• -

Framed for Murder By His Own DNA

Category : Uncategorized

This examination was released in collaboration with The Marshall Project and FRONTLINE (PBS). When the DNA results returned, even Lukis Anderson believed he may have dedicated the murder. ” I consume a lot,” he keeps in mind informing public protector Kelley Kulick as they being in a plain interview space at the Santa Clara County, California, prison. In some cases, he blacked out, so it was possible he did something he didn’t keep in mind. “Maybe I did do it.” Kulick shushed him. If she was going to keep her new customer off death row, he could not walk around stating things like that. But she concurred. It looked bad. Before he was charged with murder, Anderson was a 26-year-old homeless alcoholic with a long rap sheet who invested his days hustling for change in downtown San Jose. The murder victim, Raveesh Kumra, was a 66-year-old financier who resided in Monte Sereno, Silicon Valley enclave 10 miles and many socioeconomic rungs away.

Around midnight on November 29, 2012, a group of men had actually gotten into Kumra’s 7,000-square-foot estate. They found him enjoying CNN in the living-room, connected him, blindfolded him, and gagged him with mustache-print duct tape. They found his buddy, Harinder, asleep in an upstairs bed room, struck her on the mouth, and connected her up beside Raveesh. Then they ransacked your home for money and fashion jewelry. After the men left, Harinder, still blindfolded, felt her way to a kitchen area phone and called 911. Cops showed up, then an ambulance. Among the paramedics stated Raveesh dead. The coroner would later on conclude that he had actually been suffocated by the mustache tape.

3 and a half weeks later on, the authorities apprehended Anderson. His DNA had actually been found on Raveesh’s fingernails. They thought the men had a hard time as Anderson bound his victim. They charged him with murder. Kulick was designated to his case. As they took a look at the DNA results, Anderson tried to understand a criminal offense he had no memory of dedicating. ” Nah, nah, nah. I do not do things like that,” he remembers informing her. “But perhaps I did.” ” Lukis, stopped talking,” Kulick states she informed him. “Let’s just strike the time out button till we overcome the proof to actually see what took place.” What took place, although months would pass before anybody figured it out, was that Lukis Anderson’s DNA had actually found its way onto the fingernails of a dead man he had actually never ever even fulfilled. BACK IN THE 1980s, when DNA forensic analysis was still in its infancy, criminal offense laboratories required a speck of physical fluid– generally blood, semen, or spit– to produce a hereditary profile.

That changed in 1997, when Australian forensic researcher Roland van Oorschot stunned the criminal justice world with a nine-paragraph paper entitled “DNA Fingerprints from Fingerprints.” It exposed that DNA might be found not just from physical fluids but from traces left by a touch. Detectives around the world started searching criminal activity scenes for anything– a doorknob, a counter top, a knife handle– that a criminal might have polluted with incriminating “touch” DNA.

Facebook Feed

Our Videos